ISSN: 2074-8132
ISSN: 2074-8132
En Ru
Problems of the upper paleolithic in the foothills of the Northern Tien Shan: latest discoveries and perspectives

Problems of the upper paleolithic in the foothills of the Northern Tien Shan: latest discoveries and perspectives

Recieved: 11/02/2022

Accepted: 11/10/2022

Published: 02/28/2023

Keywords: historical anthropology; archaeological material; Northern Tien Shan; Upper Paleolithic; lithic industry; scalene triangles; Rakhat site

Available online: 28.02.2023

To cite this article

Ozherelyev Dmitry V. , Lev Sergey Yu., Stolpnikova Ekaterina M. Problems of the upper paleolithic in the foothills of the Northern Tien Shan: latest discoveries and perspectives. // Lomonosov Journal of Anthropology 2023. Issue 1. 118-128 https://doi.org/10.32521/2074-8132.2023.1.118-128.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). (CC BY 4.0). (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.ru)
Issue 1, 2023

Abstract

Introduction. This work is devoted to the assessment of the Upper Paleolithic sites of the Northern Tien Shan.

Materials and methods. Plains and foothills of Kazakhstan occupies a large western part of Central Asia and stretches from the Caspian Sea in the west to the Altai Mountains in the east. There are many Paleolithic sites, the vast majority of which are open-air (surface) sites. Recently several multilayer Upper Paleolithic sites have been discovered in the Northern Tien Shan. Among them are the sites of Maibulak, Rakhat, Uzynagash 1–3, Saryzhazyk and some others. The sites have been studied intermittently since 2004. A new research phase began in 2018.

Results and discussion. The sites are located in similar geomorphological conditions. The cultural layers of the sites are nested in loess-like loams covering the northern foothills of the Zailiysky Alatau Range. Most of the cultural layers are interpreted as habitation levels with preserved hearths, burn spots, charcoal spots, and storage pits. Accumulations of lithic artefacts and sometimes animal bone remains are tightly linked with those features of cultural layers. This is an interdisciplinary research.

Conclusion. The chronology of these sites covers the Early Upper Paleolithic, the Middle Upper Palaeolithic and the beginning of the Late Upper Paleolithic. The development of the Northern Tien Shan Upper Paleolithic took place within the framework of a single cultural vector, characteristic for the western part of Eurasia. There are cultural horizons with Aurignation-like, Gravettian-like lithic industries, as well as a culture with geometric microliths (scalene triangles). At the same time, lithic industries show considerable originality. Further work is aimed at studying the classification, typology of lithic collections and their correlation with each other. © 2023. This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 license.

References

Alpysbayev, Kh.A. Kostenko N.N. Paleolit v rayone Turlanskogo perevala khrebta Karatau [Paleolithic near the Turlan Pass of the Karatau Range]. Vestnik AN KazSSR [Bulletin AS KazSSR],1966, 6, pp. 66–69. (In Russ.).

Alpysbayev Kh.A. Pamyatniki nizhnego paleolita Yuzhnogo Kazakhstana [Lower Palaeolithic sites of the Southern Kazakhstan]. Alma-Ata, Nauka KazSSR, 1979. 208 p. (In Russ.).

Anoikin A.A., Pavlenok G.D., Kharevich V.M., Taimagambetov Zh.T., Shalagina A.V. et al. Ushbulak – novaya mnogosloynaya stoyanka verkhnego paleolita na severo-vostoke Kazakhstana [Ushbulak – A New Stratified Upper Paleolithic Site in Northeastern Kazakhstan]. Arkheologiya, etnografiya i antropologiya Evrazii [Archaeology, Ethnology & Anthropology of Eurasia], 2019, 47 (4), pp. 16–29.

Gochman I.I. Paleoliticheskaya stoyanka “Peschera” na Bukhtarme [Paleolithic site "Cave" on Bukhtarma]. Kratkie soobscheniya Instituta istorii material’noy kul’turi [Brief Communications of the Institute of the history of material culture], 1957, 67, pp. 54-58. (In Russ.).

Voloshin V.S. Stratigraphiya i perodizatsiya paleolita Tsentralnogo Kazakhstana. In Khronostratigraphiya paleolita Severnoy, Tsentralnoy, Vostochnoy Azii i Ameriki [Chronostratigraphy of the Paleolithic of North, Central, East Asia and America]. Novosibirsk, Institute of History, Philology and Philosophy SB AS USSR Publ., pp.99–106. (In Russ).

Krivoshapkin A.I., Kolobova K.A., Kharevich V.M. Industriya stoyanki Dodekatym-2 (Uzbekistan): noviye danniye po verkhnemu paleolitu regiona [The industry of the Dodekatym-2 site (Uzbekistan): new data on the Upper Paleolithic]. Vestnik NGU. Seriya Istoriya, phililogiya. Arkheologiya i etnographiya [Bulletin NSU. History, Philology, Archaeology & Ethnography]. 2009, 8 (5), pp.74-97. (In Russ.).

Ozherelyev D.V., Dzhasybaev E.A., Mamirov T.B. Pervie dannie o stratigraphii i culturnoy atributsii mnogosloynoy stoyanki verkhnego paleolita Rakhat (Yugo-Vostochniy Kazakhstan) [First data on stratigraphy and cultural attribution of Rakhat, a multi-layered Upper Palaeolithic site in Southeastern Kazakhstan]. Kratkie soobscheniya Instituta arkheologii [Brief Communications of the Institute of Archaeology], 2019, 254, pp. 57–70. (In Russ.).

Ozherelyev D.V., Dzhasybaev E.A., Mamirov T.B. Osobennosti kulturnogo sloya i poselencheskie obiekty na stoyanke verkhnego paleolita Rakhat (sloy 2) v Yugo-Vostochnom Kazakhstane [Distinctive features of the occupation layer and settlements at the Upper Paleolithic Rakhat site (layer 2) in Southeastern Kazakhstan]. Kratkie soobscheniya Instituta arkheologii [Brief Communications of the Institute of Archaeology], 2021, 262, pp. 7–26. (In Russ.).

Ozherelyev D.V., Uspenskaya O.I., Taimagambetov Zh.K. Nachal’nie etapi rannego verkhnego paleolita v predgoryakh Severnogo Tian-Shanya [The initial stages of the Early Upper Palaeolithic in the foothills of the Northern Tien Shan, Kazakhstan (Based on the materials from multi-layered Maibulak site)]. Stratum plus [Stratum plus], 2023, 1 (in press). (In Russ.).

Petrin V.T., Taimagambetov Zh.K. Kompleksi paleoliticheskoy stoyanki Shulbinka iz Verkhnego Priirtyshiya [Complexes of the Paleolithic site Shulbinka from the Upper Irtysh region]. Almaty, Kazuniversity Publ., 2000. 166 p. (In Russ.).

Taimagambetov Zh.K. Paleoliticheskaya stoyanka imeni Ch.Ch.Valikhanova [Palaeolithic site named after Ch.Ch. Valikhanov]. Alma-Ata, Nauka KazSSR Publ., 1990. 125 p. (In Russ.).

Taimagambetov Zh.K., Ozherelyev D.V. Pozdnepaleoliticheskie pamiyatniki Kazakhstana [Upper Paleolithic sites of Kazakhstan]. Almaty, Kazuniversity Publ., 2009. 256 p. (In Russ.). 

Dinnis R., Bessudnov A.A., Reynolds N., Devièse T. et al. New data for the Early Upper Paleolithic of Kostenki (Russia). J. Hum. Evol., 2019, 127, pp. 21–40. Doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2018.11.012.

Feng Z.D., Ran M., Yang Q.L., Zhai X.W. et al. Stratigraphies and chronologies of late Quaternary loess-paleosol sequences in the core area of the central Asian arid zone. Quatern. Int., 2011, 240, рр. 156–166. Doi: 10.1016/j.quaint.2010.10.019.

Fitzsimmons K. E., Iovita R., Sprafke T., Glantz M. M., Talamo S. et al. A chronological framework connecting the early Upper Palaeolithic across the Central Asian piedmont. J. Hum. Evol., 2017, 113, рр. 107–126. Doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2017.07.006.

Iovita R., Varis A., Namen A., Cuthbertson P. et al. 2020. In search of a Paleolithic Silk Road in Kazakhstan. Quatern. Int. 2020, 559, рр. 119–132. Doi: 10.1016/j.quaint.2020.02.023.

Kunitake S., The excavation of a newly discovered Upper Palaeolithic Kyzylaus-2 site in the Southern Kazakhstan. In Proceeding International Scientific and Practical Conference «Methods and methodology of natural sciences in archaeological field research», 18 sept. 2019. Almaty, Kazuniversity Publ., 2019, pp. 148–149.

Kunitake S., Taimagambetov Zh.K. Bladelet industries of the Early Upper Palaeolithic in southern Kazakhstan: A detailed analysis of carinated bladelet cores excavated from the newly discovered Buiryokbastau-Bulak-1 site in the Karatau mountains. Quatern. Int. 2021, 596, pp. 38–53. Doi: 10.1016/j.quaint.2021.03.016.

Namen A., Iovita R., Nickel K.G., Varis A. et al. Mechanical properties of lithic raw materials from Kazakhstan: Comparing chert, shale, and porphyry. PLoS ONE, 2022, 17 (4), e0265640. Doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265640.

Olszewski D. The Zarzian in the context of the Epipaleolithic Middle East. Int. J. Human., 2012, 19 (3), pp. 1–20.

Nadel D. Ohalo II: A 23,000-Year-Old Fisher-Hunter-Gatherer's Camp on the Shore of Fluctuating Lake Kinneret (Sea of Galilee). In Y. Enzel & O. Bar-Yosef (Eds.), Quaternary of the Levant: Environments, Climate Change, and Humans. 2017, Cambridge University Press, pp. 291–294. doi: 10.1017/9781316106754.033.

Teyssandier N., Bon F., Bordes J.-G. Within projectile range: some thoughts on the appearance of the Aurignacian in Europe. J.Anthropol. Res., 2010, 66, pp. 209–229. DOI: 10.2307/27820882.

Tsanova T. The beginning of the Upper Paleolithic in the Iranian Zagros: taphonomic approach and techno-economic comparison of Early Baradostian assemblages from Warwasi and Yafteh (Iran). J. Hum. Evol., 2013, 65, pp. 39–64. Doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2013.04.005.