Anthropological materials from the burial complexes of the Sarmatian period (Voniuchka-1 burial ground, Caucasian Mineral Waters region)

Abstract

Introduction. Most of the burial mounds of the Caucasian Mineral Waters region combine the burials of representatives of different archaeological cultures separated by thousands of years. Therefore, the rate of accumulation of monocultural synchronous materials in collections for some epochs is quite low, and slows down even more due to the unequal preservation of bone remains. The introduction of new information into scientific circulation based on the results of recent archaeological work will allow faster accumulation of materials and data exchange between researchers working on the same issue. The purpose of this work is to publish morphological features of the skeleton of individuals belonging to the Sarmatian culture of the Pre-Caucasus.

Materials and methods. The skeletons of three individuals, from three burials of one mound, dating from the III-I centuries BC and belonging to the nomads of the early Sarmatian time were investigated. The study used both traditional methods of anthropology and bioarchaeological approaches. Sex and age studies were carried out on all preserved parts of the skeleton according to standard anthropological methods. A program for fixing markers of stress and pathological conditions was applied to all the studied individuals.

Results. Skeletal remains of two young women and a mature man were studied. Both women had anomalies in the development of teeth: in one case – underdevelopment of enamel, in the other – partial congenital adentia. A set of specific features on the postcranial skeleton of a man allow us to characterize him as a rider, right-handed.

Discussion. The results of the study supplement our knowledge about the variability of morphological features of the skeleton of representatives of the nomads of the early Sarmatian culture. Some of the detected signs have a pronounced genetic determination; however, the data obtained is insufficient to identify kinship ties, despite the fact that according to the interpretation of archaeologists, this group of burials is defined as a generic cemetery created during the lifetime of one generation. All the discovered features of the skeleton find analogies among the published materials of synchronous time. © 2023. This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 license.

References

Alekseev V.P., Debets G.F. Kraniometriya. Metodika antropologicheskih issledovanij [Craniometry. Methodology of anthropological research]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1964. 128 p. (In Russ.).

Berezin Ya.B., Kalmykov A.A. Novye pogrebalnye kompleksy sarmatskogo vremeni iz kurgana na Kavkazskih Mineralnyh Vodah [New burial complexes of the Sarmatian period from a burial mound in the Caucasian Mineral Waters]. Nizhnevolzhskiy Arkheologicheskiy Vestnik [The Lower Volga Archaeological Bulletin], 2023, in press. (In Russ.).

Buzhilova A.P. Drevnee naselenie. Paleopatologicheskie aspekty issledovaniya [Ancient population. Paleopathological aspects of the study]. Moscow, Institute of archeology RAS Publ., 1995. 167 p. (In Russ.).

Buzhilova A.P., Kozlovskaya M.V., Mednikova M.B. Istoricheskaya ekologiya cheloveka. Metodika biologicheskih issledovanij [Historical human ecology. Methods of biological research]. Moscow, Staryj sad Publ., 1998. 260 p. (In Russ.).

Medvedickova A.I., Abramova M.Ya., Isamulaeva A.Z., Bashtovoj A.A. Rasprostranennost' i lechenie chastichnyh defektov zubnyh ryadov u detej (obzor literatury) [Prevalence and treatment of partial dentition defects in children (literature review)]. Klinicheskaya stomatologiya [Clinical dentistry], 2021, 24 (2), pp. 81–87. (In Russ.).

Pashkova V.I. Ocherki sudebno-medicinskoj osteologii [Essays on forensic osteology]. Moscow, Medgiz Publ., 1963. 154 p. (In Russ.).

Pererva E.V. Rannie sarmaty IV–III vv. do n.e. s territorii Nizhnego Povolzhya po dannym paleopatologii [Early Sarmatians of the IV–III centuries BC from the territory of the Lower Volga region according to paleopathology]. Nizhnevolzhskij arheologicheskij vestnik [The Lower Volga Archaeological Bulletin], 2020а,19 (2), pp. 74–91. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.15688/nav.jvolsu.2020.2.4.

Pererva E.V. Paleopatologicheskie osobennosti kochevnikov savromatskogo vremeni s territorii Nizhnego Povolzhya [Paleopathological features of nomads of the Sauromatic time from the territory of the Lower Volga region]. In Genesis: istoricheskie issledovaniya [Genesis: historical research], 2020б, 12, pp. 171–183. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.25136/2409- 868X.2020.12.34412.

Pererva E.V., Krivosheev M.V. Bioarheologiya kochevnikov vtoroj poloviny III – IV v. n. e. (na primere analiza nizhnevolzhskih i nizhnedonskih pogrebenij) [Bioarchaeology of the nomads of the late 3rd and 4th century AD (the case of analisis of Lower Volga and Lower Don anthropological series)]. Uralskij istoricheskij vestnik [Ural Historical Journal], 2021, 4 (73), pp. 19–28. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.30759/1728-9718-2021-4(73)-19-28.

Yakovleva M.V., Mustafaev R.R., Anohina A.V. Sovremennaya kliniko-epidemiologicheskaya harakteristika vrozhdennoj adentii [Modern clinical and epidemiological characteristics of congenital adentia]. Vestnik sovremennoi klinicheskoi mediciny [The bulletin of contemporary clinical medicine], 2013, 6 (2), pp. 73–78. (In Russ.).

 

 

Brothwell D.R. Digging up Bones. Third edition revised and updated. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press, 1981. 208 pp.

Standards for Data Collection from Human Skeletal Remains. Buikstra J.E., Ubelaker D.H. (eds.). Fayetteville: Arkansas Archeological Survey Research Series, 44, 1994. 272 pp.

Gresky J., Batieva E., Kitova A., Kalmykov A., Belinskiy A., et al. New cases of trepanations from the 5th to 3rd millennia BC in Southern Russia in the context of previous research: Possible evidence for a ritually motivated tradition of cranial surgery? Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 2016, 160 (4), pp. 665–682. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.22996.

Moore W.J., Corbett M.E. The distribution of dental caries in ancient British populations. 1. Anglo-Saxon Period. Caries Res., 1971, 5 (2), pp. 151–68. DOI: 10.1159/000259743.

Ortner D.J. Identification of Pathological Conditions in Human Skeletal Remains. Amsterdam: Academic Press, 2003. 645 pp.

Perizonius W.R.K., Pot Tj. Diachronic dental research on human skeletal remains excavated in the Netherlands. I: Dorestad’s cemetery on ‘the Heul’. Berichten van de Rijksdienst voor het Oudheidkundig Bodemonderzoek, 1981, 31, рр. 369–413.

Popa Ș., Rădac I., Torok-Oance R. Anthropological analysis of five skeletons from sarmatian culture discovered in Timișoara - Freidorf (Romania). Current Trends in Natural Sciences, 2020, 9 (18), pp. 20–31. DOI: 10.47068/ctns.2020.v9i18.003.

Schultz M. Paläopathologische Diagnostik. Anthropologie: Handbuch der vergleichenden Biologie des Menschen. Bd. 1 (1). Wesen und Methoden der Anthropologie / hrsg. von R. Knussmann. Stuttgart, Fischer Verlag, 1988. pp. 480–496.

Simalcsik A., Simalcsik R.D. The Disturbed Sarmatian Graves from Medeleni–Ungheni. Palaeoanthropological Data. Memoirs of the Scientific Sections of the Romanian Academy, 2018, XLI, pp. 43–58.

Todd T.W. Age changes in the pubic bone. I. The male white pubis. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 1920, 3. рp. 285–334.

Ubelaker D. Human Skeletal Remains: Excavation, Analysis, Interpretation. Taraxacum, Washington D.C, 1989. 172 pp.