ISSN: 2074-8132
ISSN: 2074-8132
En Ru
Variability of somatotypes according to Heath-Carter in adult Chuvash people

Variability of somatotypes according to Heath-Carter in adult Chuvash people

Recieved: 12/18/2023

Accepted: 02/20/2024

Published: 05/21/2024

Keywords: biological anthropology; human populations; somatotype according to Heath-Carter; sexual dimorphism; morphophysiological characteristics

Available online: 21.05.2024

To cite this article

Kalichman L., Chumakova Anna M., Batsevich Valery A. , Kobyliansky E. Variability of somatotypes according to Heath-Carter in adult Chuvash people . // Lomonosov Journal of Anthropology 2024. Issue 2. 22-32 https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU2074-8132-24-2-2.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). (CC BY 4.0). (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.ru)
Issue 2, 2024

Abstract

Introduction. In the range of topical problems of modern human morphology, the doctrine of bodily constitution occupies an important place, but there is a shortage of data on population variability of somatotypes in the literature. The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to study age and sex variations in body composition components using the Heath-Carter method in the Chuvash rural population examined in several villages in the Mariinsky-Posad, Morgaushsky and Yadrinsky districts of Chuvashia and Chuvash villages in the Aurgazinsky and Bizhbulyaksky districts of Bashkiria. The tasks included the determination and analysis of somatotypes according to Heath-Carter of men and women in age subgroups of adult Chuvash and assessment of age-related variability of sexual dimorphism of somatotype scores.

Materials and methods. The study sample consists of 802 men aged 18–89 years (M = 46.9) and 738 women aged 18–90 years (M = 48.6) examined in 1994, 1999 and 2002. Age and sex differences were assessed using one-way analysis of variance. Mahalanobis distances were used to rate the sexual dimorphism of somatotype components.

Results and discussion. Sex differences in the assessment of somatotype variations in the Chuvash population turn out to be most significant for the characteristics of endomorphy, with higher values in women. The values of endomorphy in men after 30 years practically did not change, but in women it continued to increase until the 6th decade, and then decreased with age. There were practically no differences in the mesomorphy; very small differences were found in ectomorphy between men and women aged 18-30 years.

Mesomorphy increases from 18-30 years to 50 in both sexes; the ectomorphy shows opposite age trends. A leveling of sex differences in all body composition components was recorded in the older part of the combined sample (70 – 80 years old).

Conclusions. Local patterns of age-related variability in body composition components for ethnic Chuvash are shown. For the first time, using representative material, indicators of sexual dimorphism have been determined for the complex of components of endomorphy, mesomorphy and ectomorphy in the Chuvash, showing the maximum intersexual differences in the age range of 41-60 years. A predominance of endomesomorphic body types in both sexes was revealed, with a tendency towards balanced mesomorphy in men (the youngest male subgroup is characterized by an ectomesomorphic somatotype). © 2024. This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 license


References

Anisimova A.V., Godina Ye.Z., Rudnev S.G., Svistunova N.V. Proverka primenimosti formul dlya bioimpedansnoy otsenki somatotipa po Khit-Karteru u detey i podrostkov v razlichnykh populyatsiyakh [Testing the applicability of formulas for bioimpedance assessment of somatotype according to Heath-Carter in children and adolescents in various populations]. Moscow University Anthropology Bulletin [Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya XXIII. Antropologiya], 2016, 2. pp. 28–38. (In Russ.).

Bunak V.V. Antropometriya [Anthropometry]. Moscow, Uchpedgiz Publ., 1941. 368 p. (In Russ.).

Deryabin V.Ye. Postroyeniye tipologii raspredeleniya mass po segmentam tela muzhchin metodom glavnykh komponent [Construction of a typology for distribution of body mass by body segments in men using the main component method]. Biologicheskiye nauki [Biological Sciences], 1985, 6, pp. 62–68. (In Russ.).

Deryabin V.Ye. Ispol'zovaniye komponentnogo analiza dlya otsenki fizicheskogo razvitiya cheloveka [The application of component analysis for assessing the physical development of men]. Biologicheskiye nauki [Biological Sciences], 1991, 7 (331), pp. 70–78. (In Russ.).

Deryabin V.Ye. Kurs lektsiy po mnogomernoy biometrii dlya antropologov [A course of lectures on multidimensional biometrics for anthropologists]. Moscow, MSU Publ., 2008. 332 p. (In Russ.).

Ivanov V.P. Nekotoryye etnodemograficheskiye i istoriko-kul'turnyye kharakteristiki chuvashskogo etnosa [Some ethnodemographic and historical-cultural characteristics of the Chuvash ethnic group]. In Chuvashi: aktual'nyye aspekty antropologii [Chuvash: current aspects of anthropology]. Cheboksary, ChGIGN Publ., 2004, pp. 12–34.

Kolesnikov V.A., Rudnev S.G., Nikolayev D.V., Anisimova A.V., Godina Ye.Z. O novom protokole otsenki somatotipa po skheme Khit-Kartera v programmnom obespechenii bioimpedansnogo analizatora sostava tela [About the new protocol for assessing the somatotype according to the Heath-Carter scheme in the software of the bioimpedance analyzer of body composition]. Moscow University Anthropology Bulletin [Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya XXIII. Antropologiya], 2016, 4, pp. 4–13. (In Russ.).

Sindeyeva L.V., Rudnev S.G. Kharakteristika polovozrastnoy izmenchivosti somatotipa po Khit-Karteru u vzroslykh lyudey i vozmozhnosti yego bioimpedansnoy otsenki (na primere russkogo naseleniya Vostochnoy Sibiri) [Characteristics of age-sex variability of somatotype according to Heath-Carter in adults and the possibility of its bioimpedance assessment (using the example of the Russian population of Eastern Siberia)] Morfologiya [Morphology]. 2017, 151, 1. pp. 77–87. (In Russ.)

Tambovtseva R.V., Zhukova S.G. Vozrastnyye izmeneniya somatotipa i komponentov massy tela devochek [Age-related changes in somatotype and body weight components of girls]. Morfologiya [Morphology], 2005, 27 (1), pp. 48–51. (In Russ.).

 Anisimova A., Godina E., Nikolaev D., Rudnev S. Evaluation of the Heath-Carter somatotype revisited: new bioimpedance equations for children and adolescents. IFMBE proceedings, 2016, 54, pp. 80–83.

Arking R. Biology of aging. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2006. 624 p. ISBN: 9780195167399.

Bailey D.A., Carter J.E.L., Mirwarld R. Somatotypes of Canadian men and women. Hum. Biol., 1982, 54, pp. 813–828.

Bhuiyan A.R., Gustat J., Srinivasan S.R., Berenson G.S. Differences in body shape representations among young adults from a biracial (Black-White), semirural community: the Bogalusa Heart Study. Am. J. Epidemiol., 2003, 158, pp. 792–797. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwg218.

Bodzsa´r E.B., Susanne. C. Secular growth changes in Europe. Budapest, Eötvös University Press, 1998. 381 p.

Buffa R., Succa V., Garau D., Marini E., Floris G. Variations of somatotype in elderly Sardinians. Am. J. Hum. Biol., 2005, 17, pp. 403–411. DOI: 10.1002/ajhb.20141.

Carter J.E.L, Heath B.H. Somatotyping: development and applications. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1990. pp. 503. ISBN: 0521351170.

Carter J.E., Parizkova J. Changes in somatotypes of European males between 17 and 24 years. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 1978, 48, pp. 251–254. DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.1330480221.

Cressie N.A.C., Withers R.T., Craig N.P. The statistical analysis of somatotype data. Yrbk. Phys. Anthropol., 1986, 29, pp. 197–208. DOI:10.1002/ajpa.1330290509.

Eiben O.G., Buday J., Bosze P. Physique of patients with carcinoma of the female genital tract. Eur. J. Gynaecol. Oncol., 2004, 25, pp. 638–683.

Elia M. Obesity in the elderly. Obes. Res., 2001, 9 (4), pp. 244–248. DOI: 10.1038/oby.2001.126.

Gaur R., Singh R.P. Age differences in somatotype of Gartwali males 17–60 years of age. Am. J. Hum. Biol., 1997, 9, pp. 285–290. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6300(1997)9:3<285::AID-AJHB1>3.0.CO;2-Y.

Heath B.H., Carter J.E. A modified somatotype method. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 1967, 27, pp. 57–74.

Herrera H., Rebato E., Herna´ndez R., Herna´ndez-Valera Y., Alfonso-Sa´nchez M.A. Relationship between somatotype and blood pressure in a group of institutionalized Venezuelan elders. Gerontology, 2004, 50, pp. 223–229. DOI: 10.1159/000078351.

Kalichman L., Cohen Z., Kobyliansky E., Livshits G. Interrelationship between bone aging traits and basic anthropometric characteristics. Am. J. Hum. Biol., 2002, 14, pp. 380–390. DOI:10.1002/ajhb.10051.

Kalichman L., Kobyliansky E., Malkin I., Yakovenko K., Livshits G. Search for linkage between hand osteoarthritis and 11q 12-13 chromosomal segment. Osteoarthritis Cartilage, 2003, 11, pp. 561–568. DOI: 10.1016/s1063-4584(03)00093-1.

Kalichman L., Livshits G., Kobyliansky E. Association between somatotypes and blood pressure. Ann. Human. Biol., 2004, 31, pp. 466–476. DOI: 10.1080/03014460412331281728.

Kalichman L., Malkin I., Kobyliansky E. Association between physique characteristics and hand skeletal aging status in an adult Chuvasha population. Am. J. Phys. Anthopol., 2005, (Epub ahead of print).

Katzmarzyk P.T., Malina R.M. Body size and physique among Canadians of First Nation and European ancestry. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 1999, 108, pp. 161–172. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(199902)108:2<161::AID-AJPA3>3.0.CO;2-B.

Katzmarzyk P.T., Malina R.M., Song T.M., Bouchard C. Physique, subcutaneous fat, adipose tissue distribution, and risk factors in the Quebec Family Study. Int. J. Obes. Relat. Metab. Disord., 1999, 23, pp. 476–484. DOI: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0800844.

Katzmarzyk P.T, Malina R.M, Perusse L., Rice T., Province M.A., Rao D.C,. Bouchard C. Familial resemblance for physique: heritability for somatotype components. Ann Hum Biol., 2000, 27, pp. 467–477. DOI: 10.1080/030144600419305.

Kirchengast S., Peterson B., Hauser G., Knogler W. Body composition characteristics are associated with the bone density of the proximal femur end in middle- and old-aged women and men. Maturitas, 2001, 39, pp. 133–145. DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5122(01)00205-5.

Kretschmer E. Physique and character: An investigation of the nature of constitution and the theory of temperament. New York, 1921, Harcourt Brace Publ., 226 p.

Livshits G., Yakovenko K., Ginsburg E., Kobyliansky E. Genetics of human body size and shape: pleiotropic and independent genetic determinants of adiposity. Ann. Hum. Biol., 1998, 25, pp. 221–236. DOI: 10.1080/03014469800005592.

Livshits G., Karasik D., Kobyliansky E. Complex segregation analysis of the radiographic phalanges bone mineral density and their age-related changes. J. Bone Miner. Res., 2002a, 17, pp. 152–161. DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.2002.17.1.152.

Livshits, G., Roset, A., Yakovenko, K., Trofimov, S., Kobyliansky, E. Genetics of human body size and shape: body proportions and indices. Ann. Hum. Biol., 2002b, 29, pp. 271–289. DOI:10.1080/03014460110085322.

Malina R.M., Katzmarzyk P.T., Song T.M.K., Theriault G., Bouchard C. Somatotype and cardiovascular risk factors in healthy adults. Am. J. Hum. Biol., 1997, 9, pp. 11–19. DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1520-6300(1997)9:1<11::AID-AJHB3>3.0.CO;2-T.

Monyeki K.D., Toriola A.L., de Ridder J.H., Kemper H.C., Steyn, N.P., Nthangeni M.E., Twisk J.W., van Lenthe F.J. Stability of somatotypes in 4 to 10-year-old rural South African girls. Ann. Hum. Biol., 2002, 29, pp. 37–49. DOI:10.1080/03014460110054984.

Pavlovsky O., Kobyliansky E. Population biology of human aging. Firenze, Angelo Pontecoroboli Editore, Publishing House, 1997. 147 p.

Perissinotto E., Pisent C., Sergi G., Grigoletto F. ILSA Working Group (Italian Longitudinal Study on Ageing). Anthropometric measurements in the elderly: age and gender differences. Br. J. Nutr., 2002, 87, pp. 177–186. DOI: 10.1079/bjn2001487.

Ravaglia G., Forti, P., Maioli F., Nesi B., Pratelli L., Cucinotta D., Bastagli L., Cavalli G. Body composition, sex steroids, IGF-1, and bone mineral status in aging men. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., 2000, 55, pp. 516–521. DOI: 10.1093/gerona/55.9.m516.

Rebato E., Rosique J., Gonzalez Apraiz A. Somatotypes of 14 to 19-years-old urban boys and girls from Bilbao (Basque Country). Anthropol. Anz., 1996, 54, pp. 135–147.

Sheldon W.H. The somatotype, the morphophenotype and the morphogenotype. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol., 1950, 15, pp. 373–382.

Singal P., Sidhu L.S. Age changes and comparison of somatotypes during 20 to 80 years in Jat-Sikh and Bania females of Punjab (India). Anthropol. Anz., 1984, 42, pp. 281–289. DOI:10.1080/09720073.2002.11890737.

Suk E.K., Malkin I., Dahm S., Kalichman L., Ruf N., Kobyliansky E., Toliat M., Rutsch F., Nurnberg P., Livshits G. Association of ENPP1 gene polymorphisms with hand osteoarthritis in a Chuvasha population. Arthritis. Res. Ther., 2005, 7, рр.1082–1090. DOI: 10.1186/ar1786.

Williams S.R.P., Goodfellow J., Davies B., Bell W., McDowell I., Jones E. Somatotype and angiographically determined atherosclerotic coronary artery disease in men. Am. J. Hum. Biol., 2000, 12, pp. 128-138. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6300(200001/02)12:1<128::AID-AJHB14>3.0.CO;2-X.

Wilson B.R., Olson H.W., Sprague H.A., Van Huss W.D., Montoye H.J. Somatotype and longevity of former university athletes and non-athletes. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport., 1990, 61, pp. 1–6. DOI: 10.1080/02701367.1990.10607472.