ISSN: 2074-8132
ISSN: 2074-8132
En Ru
Ethnic aspects of variability of somatic sex dimorphism through parapubertal period

Ethnic aspects of variability of somatic sex dimorphism through parapubertal period

Recieved: 07/15/2024

Accepted: 09/23/2024

Published: 02/24/2025

Keywords: anthropological variability; auxology; somatic variability; main anthropometric dimensions; intersex differences; pearapubertal age (9–17 years)

Available online: 24.02.2025

To cite this article

Fedotova Tatiana K. , Gorbacheva Anna K. Ethnic aspects of variability of somatic sex dimorphism through parapubertal period. // Lomonosov Journal of Anthropology 2025. Issue 1. 29-39 https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU2074-8132-25-1-3.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). (CC BY 4.0). (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.ru)
Issue 1, 2025

Abstract

Introduction. The formation of the vector and level of sex somatic differences in parapubertal period (9–17 years) is under discussion, apart with ethnic peculiarities of dynamics of sexual dimorphism of main anthropometric dimensions.

Material and methods. The construction of intergroup distribution of standardized values of sexual dimorphism of body dimensions in 9, 13 and 17 years demanded generalization of the wide spectrum of literary data on children of Russia and former USSR of 1950–2010 (over 500 samples). The quantitative estimation of SD value is based on Kullback divergence, analogue of Makhalanobis distance. To estimate the contribution of ethnic factor to the variation of SD, several pairs of samples of different ethnicity (aboriginal and Russian population), but from one and the same ecological niche, examined simultaneously, were compared.

Results. The significant influence of age factor on intergroup distribution of SD was fixed. Significant positive correlations of SD with the values of dimensions themselves for boys aged 13 and 17 years first of all (0,48–0,63 for height/weight dimensions) and negative or close to zero correlations for girls were revealed. The dynamics of somatic SD through the age interval 9–17 years for pairs of samples Estonians-Russians, Kyrgyz-Russians, Tatars-Russians, Uzbeks-Russians is, as a whole, invariant, concerning ethnicity of samples, and witness to the dominance of age physiological peculiarities over ethnic.

Conclusion. Variability of somatic SD through parapubertal age period has more or less Gaussian distribution form as well as anthropometric dimensions themselves. Significant correlations of standardized levels of SD of dimensions with the mean sample values of dimensions have different directions for boys and girls – positive in the first case, negative or close to zero in the second case, which corresponds to the same conformity of adults and may be interpreted as the confirmation of the contribution of somatic variability of male sex to formation of sex differences. Local comparisons of the compact number of ethnic groups from one and the same ecological niche didn’t reveal intergroup specificity of growth dynamics in connection with ethnic factor, which is defined by high growth rates in parapubertal period and domination of overethnic species conformities over local ethnic peculiarities. © 2025. This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 license

References

Bezrukih M.M. Metodological approaches to the problem of age growth. In: Physiology of growth and development of children and adolescents (theoretical and clinical problems: practical guide]. Moscow, GOETAR-Media Publ., 2006, pp. 39–67. (In Russ.).

Gudkova L.K., Perevozchikov I.V., Balakhonova E.I., Kochetkova N.I., Maurer A.M. et al. Anthropology of Kamchatka migrants. Vestnik Moscovskogo Universiteta. Seriya XXIII. Antropologiya [Moscow University Anthropology Bulletin], 2012, 1, pp. 17–32. (In Russ.).

Deryabin V.E. About dynamics of asimmetry of curves of distribution of body parameters of children of peripubertal period. In: Scientific almanac of the department of Anthropology. Issue 4. Moscow, Entsiklopediya rossiyskih dereven Publ., 2006, pp. 19-30. (In Russ.).

Deryabin V.E. Lectures on general somatology of human. Part III. Moscow, OOO Petrorush Publ., 2008. 215 p. (In Russ.).

Zimina S.N. Variability of sexual dimorphism of somatic traits under the influence of environment factors. PhD in Biology Dissertation. Moscow, 2019. 176 p. (In Russ.).

Kullback S. Information Theory and Statistics. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1967. 408 p. (In Russ.).

Kurshakova Yu.S. Quantitative patterns of age changes of anthropometric characteristics of children. In: Growth and development of child. Moscow, Izdatelstvo Moskovskogo Universiteta Publ., 1973, pp. 189–218. (In Russ.).

Kurshakova Yu.S. Stability, mobility and factors of variability of morphological composition of population. In: Problems of dimensional anthropological standardization for designing clothes. Moscow, Lyogkaya industriya Publ., 1978, pp. 225–245. (In Russ.).

Maslova G.M., Sonkin V.D., Tambovtseva R.V., Bukreeva D.P., Vasil’eva R.M. Onthogenesis of muscle performance: causes and effects. In: Materials of the international conference «Physiology of human development». Moscow, Verdana Publ., 2009, pp. 61–62. (In Russ.).

Materials on physical development of chidren and adolescents. Issue I. Eds: A.Ya. Goldfeld, A.M. Merkov, A.G. Tseytlin. Moscow, Medgiz Publ., 1962. 375 p. (In Russ.).

Materials on physical development of chidren and adolescents of cities and rural regions of the USSR. Issue 2. Eds: A.Ya. Goldfeld, A.M. Merkov, A.G. Tzeytlin. Leningrad, Meditzina Publ., 1965. 670 p. (In Russ.).

Materials on physical development of chidren and adolescents of cities and rural regions of the USSR. Issue III. Eds: A.M. Merkov, A.F. Serenko, G.N. Serdukovskaya. Moscow, Meditzina Publ., 1977. 496 p. (In Russ.).

Materials on physical development of chidren and adolescents of cities and rural regions of the USSR. Issue IV. Part I. Eds: V.V. Kanep, G.N. Serdukovskaya, A.F. Sereko, V.K. Ovcharov. Moscow, Vsesouzniy NII sotsialnoy gigieny i organizatsii zdravoohraneniya im. N.A. Semashko Publ., 1986. 171 p. (In Russ.).

Materials on physical development of chidren and adolescents of cities and rural regions of the USSR. Issue IV. Part II. Eds: G.N. Serdukovskaya, V.V. Kanep, A.F. Sereko, V.K. Ovcharov. Moscow, Vsesouzniy NII sotsialnoy gigieny i organizatsii zdravoohraneniya im. N.A. Semashko Publ., 1988. 223 p. (In Russ.).

Materials on physical development of chidren and adolescents of cities and rural regions of the Russian Federation. Issue 5. Eds: T.M. Maksimova, L.G. Podunova. Moscow, Vsesouzniy NII sotsialnoy gigieny i organizatsii zdravoohraneniya im. N.A. Semashko RAMN Publ., 1998. 192 p. (In Russ.).

Fedotova T.K., Gorbacheva A.K., Deryabin V.E. Influence of medical, social, economic and ecological factors on growth of Moscow children. Moscow, VINITI RAS Publ., 2007. 228 p. (In Russ.).

Physical development of children and adolescents of Russian Federation. Collection of materials. Issue VI. Eds: A.A. Baranov, V.R. Kuchma. Moscow, Pediatr Publ., 2013. 191 p. (In Russ.).

Physical development of children and adolescents of Russian Federation. Issue VII. Text book. Eds: V.R. Kuchma, N.A. Skoblina, O.Yu. Milushkina. Moscow, Litterra Publ., 2019. 176 p. (In Russ.).

Chizhikova T.P., Smirnova N.S. [Variability of somatic characteristics as indicator of condition of population. Problems of anthropology, 2005, 92, pp. 165–175. (In Russ.).

 Addo O.Y., Himes J.H. Reference curves for triceps and subscapular skinfold thicknesses in US children and adolescents. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2010, 91 (3), pp. 635–642. DOI: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.28385.

Antoszewska A., Wolański N. Sexual dimorphism in newborns and adults. Studies in Human Ecology, 1992, 10. pp. 23–38.

Blanckenhorn W.U., Stillwell R.C., Young K.A., Fox C.W., Ashton K.G. et al. When Rensch meets Bergmann: Does sexual size dimorphism change systematically with latitude? Evolution, 2006, 60 (10), pp. 2004–2011.

Bogin B., Scheffler C., Hermanussen M. Global effects of income and income inequality on adult height and sexual dimorphism in height. American Journal of Human Biology, 2017, 29 (2), pp. 1–11. DOI: 10.1002/ajhb.22980.

Chrzanowska M., Suder A. Ontogenesis changes and sex dimorphism of subcutaneous fat distribution: 12-year longitudinal study of children and adolescents from Cracow, Poland. American Journal of Human Biology, 2008, 20 (4), pp. 424–430. DOI: 10.1002/ajhb.20749.

Eveleth P.B. Differences between ethnic groups in sex dimorphism of adult height. Annals of Human Biology, 1975, 2 (1), pp. 35–39. DOI: 10.1080/03014467500000541.

Fedotova T.K., Gorbacheva A.K. Ethnic variability of growth processes through the prism of sexual dimorphism of body dimensions (based on data of early and first childhood children. Vestnik Arheologii, Antropologii i Etnografii. Online Media, 2023, 2, pp. 124–138. (In Russ.).

Gorbacheva A.K., Fedotova T.K. Age variability of sexual dimorphism of body dimensions in infancy (based on Moscow sample of 1970s). Moscow University Anthropology Bulletin, 2021, 4, pp. 47–58. (In Russ.).

Gorbacheva A.K., Fedotova T.K. Intergroup variability of age dynamics of sexual dimorphism of body dimensions in infancy in connection with ethnic factor. Moscow University Anthropology Bulletin, 2022, 2, pp. 17–29. (In Russ.).

Greil H. Patterns of sexual dimorphism from birth to senescence. Collegium Antropologicum, 2006, 30 (3), pp. 637–641.

Greil H., Lange E. Sexual dimorphism from birth to age 60 in relation to the type of body shape. Anthropologischer Anzeiger, 2007, 65 (1), pp. 61–73.

Gültekin T., Akin G., Ozer B.K. Gender differences in fat patterning in children living in Ankara. Anthropologischer Anzeiger, 2005, 63 (4), pp. 427–437.

Gustafsson A., Lindenfors P. Latitudinal patterns in human stature and sexual stature dimorphism. Annals of Human Biology, 2009, 36 (1), pp. 74–87. DOI: 10.1080/03014460802570576.

Holden C., Mace R. Sexual dimorphism in stature and women’s work: A phylogenetic crosscultural analysis. American Journal Physical Anthropology, 1999, 110 (10), pp. 127–145.

Kanazawa S., Novak D.L. Human sexual dimorphysm in size may be triggered by environmental cues. Journal of Biosocial Science, 2005, 37, pp. 657–665. DOI: 10.1017/S0021932004007047.

Kirchengast S. Human sexual dimorphism – a sex and gender perspective. Anthropologischer Anzeiger, 2014, 71 (1–2), pp. 123–133. DOI: 10.1127/0003-5548/2014/0376.

Nikitovic D. Sexual dimorphism (humans). Wiley Online Library, 2018. DOI: 10.1002/9781118584538.ieba0443.

Nikitovic D., Bogin B. Ontogeny of sexual size dimorphism and environmental quality in Guatemalan children. American Journal of Human Biology, 2014, 26 (2), pp. 117–123. DOI: 10.1002/ajhb.22492.

Rosenfeld R.G. Sexual Dimorphism in the Growth of Homo sapiens: Facts, Inferences and Speculation. Deciphering Growth. Berlin, Springer, 2005, pp. 19–26. DOI: 10.1007/3- 540-28902-X_2.

Sexual dimorphism in Homo sapiens. A question of size. New-York, Preager, 1982. 429 p.

Vizmanos B., Llop-Viñolas D., Quezada-Figueroa N., Sánchez-Sucilla M., Fernández-Ballart J.D. et al. Body fat at pubertal genital stage 2: A comparison between Spanish and Mexican boys. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2009, 63 (6), pp. 732–738. DOI: 10.1038/ejcn.2008.37.

Webster-Gandy J., Warren J., Henry C.J. Sexual dimorphism in fat patterning in a sample of 5 to 7-year-old children in Oxford. International Journal of Food Science and Nutrition, 2003, 54 (6), pp. 467–471. DOI: 10.1080/09637480310001322323.

Wells J.C.K. Sexual dimorphism of body composition. Best Practice and Research: Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, 2007, 21 (3), pp. 415–430. DOI: 10.1016/j.beem.2007.04.007.

Wells J.C.K. Sexual dimorphism in body composition across human populations: Associations with climate and proxies for short- and long-term energy supply. American Journal of Human Biology, 2012, 24 (4), pp. 411–419. DOI: 10.1002/ajhb.22223.

Wolfe L.D., Gray P. Latitude and intersocietal variation of human sexual dimorphism of stature. Human Ecology, 1982, 10 (3), pp. 409–416.

Zajitschek S.R.K., Zajitschek F., Bonduriansky R., Brooks R.C., Cornwell W. et al. Sexual dimorphism in trait variability and its eco-evolutionary and statistical implications. eLife, 2020, 9, pp. 1–17. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.63170.